In working through personal reflective space, whether alone or with a coach or mentor, the quality of dialogue is critical. The type of questions used, their relevance and their capacity to stimulate reflection and understanding, are all important. So, too, is the nature and depth of reflection – in particular, how well intellectual analysis and…
Membership Required
You must be a member to access this content.
Why not sign up to a month’s free trial?
Related Content
-
Working with SUIs (Significant Unresolved Issues)
The concept of Significant Unresolved Issues arose from David Clutterbuck’s...
-
Focusing on the right problem
A survey reported in Harvard Business Review asked 106 executives...
-
Designing effective coaching and mentoring programmes
The design of effective coaching and mentoring programmes consists of...
-
Further Techniques for Coaching and Mentoring
Building on the success of companion volume Techniques for Coaching and...
-
The dangers of relying on an AI to write an article
AIs like Gemini or ChatGPT can be very helpful in speeding up research. I’ve always been careful to check out any references with another source, such as Google Scholar or Research Gate and where possible go beyond the abstract to evaluate the whole paper. Most of the time, I find that the work is genuine and that I can extract what I need from the article text. But not all the time.
-
The addictive power of AI
One of the results of this is that the more we use AI, the more we may unconsciously be dumbing ourselves down.