Practising coaches building their practice
An implicit assumption within coaching and mentoring is that the coachee or mentee is motivated to change. That isn’t always the case and even when it is, there is a big difference between externally motivated change (doing something because you have to) and internally motivated change (doing something because you want to). Internally or intrinsically...
You must be a member to access this content.
Why not sign up to a month's free trial?
One of the common and dangerous misunderstandings of managers in organisations is called correspondence bias. We tend to assuming that someone else’s behaviour (positive or negative) can be attributed to fixed personality traits (for example, the need to control, or risk aversion), while explaining our own bad behaviour as a reaction to circumstances. Gilbert identifies...
You must be a member to access this content.
Why not sign up to a month's free trial?
A model developed by Ken Blanchard and presented in his book Trust Works provides a simple framework for understanding, communicating, developing and assessing trust. It identifies four areas: Able = demonstrating capability Believable = showing integrity, honesty, respect and sincerity Connected = caring for other people, listening to them, being empathetic Dependable = being reliable; (more…)
What it is: The Diversity Awareness Ladder is a tool, created by David Clutterbuck, to help both clients and practitioners understand and work with their stereotypes and implicit biases about people, who they perceive as different from themselves. It has also been used widely in the context of general diversity education. How does it work? (more…)
Foul-up factors (FUF’s) are the gremlins that bedevil every complex system. A simple way to explore FUFs is to draw a schematic model of the key business processes. (The principle can be used at every level from organisational and functional to project management or individual service tasks.) In many healthcare organisations, the system has three (more…)
The questionnaire How Effective Are your Team Meetings? provides a useful resource for assessing how effective (or not) your team meetings really are. Score each statement from 5 (this describes our meetings accurately) to 1 (they are not like this at all). The results within a team may show significant differences. Sharing these with the team (more…)
One of the biggest criticisms of agile methodology is that it is very difficult to transfer from a project team environment to teams engaged in “business as usual” (BAU). In the latter, there is no definable end to the process. Instead of experimenting and making continuous improvements, in pursuit of frequently changing priorities, stable team (more…)
Read More The Principles of BEAU Teams: Agile processes for stable teams
An Experiment Register is a document that allows an individual or team to take a planned approach to continuous change. The register consists of the following seven elements: The number of experiments at one time depends on capacity to attend to them. When addressing the same issue or opportunity with different experiments, you may choose (more…)
Innovation Risk Define the problem Why is this an issue? What are the benefits of tackling it? What are the benefits of not tackling it? Who are the stakeholders? How would each stakeholder group define the problem? Why do we need to deal with this now? Define the boundaries Is this part of a larger (more…)
One of the most frequent areas of confusion is the around Accreditation (or Credentialing for the ICF). All 3 main governing bodies have different requirements, processes and standards which continue to evolve as the coaching market does but for now, I am only focusing on the main 2 bodies our coaches are linked with – (more…)
Read More EMCC & ICF Accreditation and Credentialing Information:
